In light of the fact that in my mind science fiction and fantasy are complete opposite genres, I thought I’d take some time to explore this valid question. I had this discussion with a few people online a while back and I have included part of the debate below.
*A bit lengthy, but an interesting debate.
Person 1:
Star Wars is not Science Fiction, it is Space Fantasy, there is a difference.
Me:
Here is a little info I was able to come up with:
From http://www.kheper.net/topics/scifi/grading.html
"Star Wars is considered "Space Fantasy" by its creator, but sci fi by others."
"The original Star Wars might be considered Very Soft Sci Fi, although George Lucas specifically defines it as "Space Fantasy", rather than "Science Fiction.”
"SCIENCE FANTASY: claims to be Science Fiction but also includes one or more supernaturalist elements that remove it from the realm of pure Science Fiction. Star Wars can more properly be included with other Soft Sci Fi popular universes. The only "fantasy" element in SW is The Force, and even this is explained in technobabble terms (midichlorians") in the prequel trilogy."
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_fantasy
Science fantasy is a subclass of science fiction sometimes with some fantasy elements thrown in, resulting in a blending of the two popular genres of writing
Seems to me that "Space Fantasy" was a term that Lucas came up with himself. Most websites that I could come up with considered SW to be bascially a Sci-fi. Others went as far as to say it was a Science Fantasy which according to wikipedia is a "subclass of science fiction."
So I guess in the end I was right. Star Wars = Science Fiction... with a few fantasy elements thrown in.
Person 1:
Other way around, it is a fantasy story that uses science fiction elements to help tell its story.
Me:
Well the evidence I presented indicates to the contrary. And there is much more where that came from. Do a google search for "Science Fiction Star Wars" and read through a few pages.
Most people classify SW as sci-fi, other's classify it as Science Fantasy which by definition is a "subclass of science fiction." I didn't make this stuff up bro, it's right out of the encyclopedia.
Person 1:
Personally, I don't care where it comes from. The complete plot of Star Wars relies on Fantasy elements, not science.
Person 2:
I'm with Dom on this one. It's very much a fantasy story, just set in a technologically advanced world. It's more fantasy than sci-fi, it's just not in the traditional dragons/wizards world. . .yet it does contain the classic fantasy elements (if the Force isn't magic, then I don't know what is!)
Me:
Believe me I see your point. I agree in every whit that the Force is a magical element and therefore a fantasy element (though they did try to sci-fi it a little with an explanation of midichlorienes - sorry about spelling). All I was saying is what I was able to find on line.
So I started thinking, if you did the entire 6 movies over but omitted the element of the force (I know it'd be nearly a different movie), then it would be a bunch of guys (knights in a way) wielding light sabers and flying around on hover cars and intergalactic star ships in a galaxy far far away. Which technically makes them aliens with advanced technology. Sounds fairly sci-fi-ish to me. Sci-fi with fantasy elements if you add back the force. But to me, the force is merely an alien ability.
Person 1:
That's a moot point, you can't take away the force from Star Wars without completely changing the film, even if you did, it would still be space fantasy.
In the end, you can see that I presented a lot of information that basically proved that SW is a sci-fi, but these people had closed eyes. My conclusion: SW = sci-fi. Having read the above conversation, what say you?